Wet Process vs Dry Process Rubberized Asphalt

Why Dry Process is More Efficient

Wet Process vs Dry Process

 

In the world of asphalt paving, rubberized asphalt has emerged as an innovative solution for improving the durability, sustainability, and performance of road surfaces. This type of asphalt incorporates ground-up rubber from recycled tires to enhance the mix. There are two primary methods used to produce rubberized asphalt: Dry Process Engineered Crumb Rubber (ECR) and Wet Process Rubber. While both processes offer advantages over traditional asphalt, the Dry Process stands out as the superior choice in terms of cost-effectiveness, durability, environmental benefits, performance, and ease of production. In this blog, we will explore wet process vs dry process rubberized asphalt and why dry process is the preferred method.

Why Dry Process Rubberized Asphalt

Skid Resistance:

The Dry Process ECR mixture improves the skid resistance of the pavement, making roads safer in wet conditions. This helps reduce the risk of accidents caused by hydroplaning or loss of traction on wet roads.

Better Stress Absorption:

Dry Process ECR is more flexible and elastic than regular asphalt, which allows it to better absorb stresses caused by temperature variations, traffic loads, and freeze-thaw cycles. This results in a smoother, more stable surface that requires less maintenance over time.

Long-Term Performance:

Dry Process ECR is better able to handle the stresses of heavy traffic, extreme temperatures, and frequent freeze-thaw cycles. The rubber particles reduce the likelihood of rutting, cracking, and general surface deterioration, which ensures a longer-lasting road surface.

1. Cost-Effectiveness

The Wet Process Rubber requires heating and constant agitation in a tank to try to avoid particle settling and, in turn, plugging issues typical of wet process.  The agitation equipment is highly specialized and expensive to purchase, operate and maintain. Moreover, often the Wet Process Rubber deploys other additives to mitigate particle settle down, which could result in an increase in the overall cost of producing Wet Process Rubber binder at a terminal.  The finished product also has a shelf life that impacts production schedule.  Unlike Wet Process Rubber, Dry Process ECR can be used on demand. It allows the plant operator to vary the dosage of the mixture and adjust production schedules as needed due to unavoidable circumstances such as inclement weather, equipment issues or other unexpected delays. The asphalt mix producer has complete control over the production schedule rather than depending on terminals for Wet Process Rubber binder supply.

Wet Process vs Dry Process Rubberized Asphalt

5. Superior Performance Characteristics

Noise Reduction: The Dry Process ECR mixture results in lower road-tire noise, creating a quieter and more pleasant driving experience. This is particularly beneficial in urban areas, near residential neighborhoods, and around schools where noise pollution is a concern.

6. Consistency and Quality Control